Importance of risk communication in risk analysis to assessment genetically modified organism and their products
Main Article Content
Abstract
A management decision with regard to the permissibility of hazard for releases organism from new biotechnology, into the environment, decision made about the result of risk analysis, and it made on scientific basis in order to do safe to human health and environment. We most to use scientifically information. The objective of this work is to show the importance that the communication as a tool to provide a forum for interchange among the hazard. This will aim at guaranteeing that the releases of genetically modified organisms or their products are made in safe conditions.
Article Details
How to Cite
Lorenzo HernándezM., RodríguezO., ParejaI., MenéndezJ. C., & La RosaJ. (2002). Importance of risk communication in risk analysis to assessment genetically modified organism and their products. Cub@: Medio Ambiente Y Desarrollo, 2(2). Retrieved from https://cmad.ama.cu/index.php/cmad/article/view/26
Section
Original Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Directrices Técnicas Internacionales del PNUMA sobre seguridad de la Biotecnología. PNUMA 1995
Doyle K. A.. Models used in Australia in risk assessment for veterinary biologicals. OIE Scientific and Technical Review. Vol, 14, No 4, 1995.
Gay Cyril G. and Richard L. Orr. Risk Analysis for Veterinary Biologics. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ( APHIS ). The United States Department of Agriculture ( USDA ). 1994.
John J. Doyle and Gabrielle J. Persley Editors. Enabling the Safe Use of Biotechnology. Principles and Practice. Environmentally Sustainable Development studies and monogrphs series No 10. The World Bank 1996.
North D. W.. Limitations, definitions, principles and methods of risk analysis. OIE Scientific and Technical Review. Vol, 14, No 4, 1995.
Silva S. V. P. S., B. S. Samagh and R. S. Morley. Risk analysis for veterinary biologicals released into the environment. OIE. Scientific and Technical Review Vol 14, No 4, 1995.
Tzotzos T. G. Genetically Modified Organisms. A guide to Biosafety. UNIDO, UNEP, ICGEB, 1995.
Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica (2000). Protocolo de Cartagena sobre Seguridad de la Biotecnología del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica: texto y anexos. Montreal: Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica.
Doyle K. A.. Models used in Australia in risk assessment for veterinary biologicals. OIE Scientific and Technical Review. Vol, 14, No 4, 1995.
Gay Cyril G. and Richard L. Orr. Risk Analysis for Veterinary Biologics. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ( APHIS ). The United States Department of Agriculture ( USDA ). 1994.
John J. Doyle and Gabrielle J. Persley Editors. Enabling the Safe Use of Biotechnology. Principles and Practice. Environmentally Sustainable Development studies and monogrphs series No 10. The World Bank 1996.
North D. W.. Limitations, definitions, principles and methods of risk analysis. OIE Scientific and Technical Review. Vol, 14, No 4, 1995.
Silva S. V. P. S., B. S. Samagh and R. S. Morley. Risk analysis for veterinary biologicals released into the environment. OIE. Scientific and Technical Review Vol 14, No 4, 1995.
Tzotzos T. G. Genetically Modified Organisms. A guide to Biosafety. UNIDO, UNEP, ICGEB, 1995.
Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica (2000). Protocolo de Cartagena sobre Seguridad de la Biotecnología del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica: texto y anexos. Montreal: Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica.